CSCA - Great Ideas for Teaching (G.I.F.T.) - 2013 Call for Papers Reminder
GREAT IDEAS FOR TEACHING (G.I.F.T.)
Call for Submissions
2013 Central States Communication Association
Marriott Downtown, Kansas City, MO
April 2-7, 2013
“Communicating the Possible”
Great Ideas for Teaching (G.I.F.T.) invites submissions of classroom tested teaching activities to share with novice and veteran communication instructors. G.I.F.T. sessions feature round-table presentations of teaching activities that demonstrate how to apply a myriad of communication theories and concepts. Traditionally, G.I.F.T. submissions have focused on public speaking, interpersonal, small group, organizational, and hybrid courses; however, we encourage creative submissions from any facet of our discipline and especially encourage submissions related to the convention theme: Communicating the Possible. The top two submissions will be recognized with a cash award and a Certificate of Merit.
Given the increase in online teaching, we hope to continue offering one session devoted exclusively to teaching activities completed in online classes. While the assignments will focus on assignments completed online, presenters will share their online activities in person at the conference.
Individuals who have their activities selected for presentation will share their ideas several times in a small group context. Typically, each presenter will have eight minutes to share her or his teaching activity eight times with different audience members each time. Presenters are expected to arrive with 75 hard copies of their assignments that will be distributed during their session.
Successful G.I.F.T. submissions should contain each of the following components:
- Title of the activity
- Course(s) for which this activity is intended
- Goal and Objective(s) of the activity
- Rationale for conducting the activity
- Description of the activity, including any preparation/preliminary steps and materials needed
- Debriefing of the activity, including typical results
- Appraisal of the activity, including any limitations or variations
- References and/or Suggested Readings
Submissions must be no longer than 2 pages of actual text written within accepted publishing guidelines (not including references/bibliographies or handouts).
Please submit all proposals as two (2) Microsoft Word file attachments to email@example.com no later than 11:59 PM EST on October 5, 2012. The first file should contain one page that identifies the author’s (1) name, (2) title of the activity, (3) school affiliation, (4) current CSCA membership status, (5) mailing address, (6) email address, and (7) phone number. The second file should contain the teaching activity and should not contain any author-identifiers. The e-mail subject line should include the abbreviation CSCA and the title of the activity. Proposals not meeting these submission guidelines may not be distributed for review. If you are submitting an online teaching activity, please make this clear by typing “ONLINE ACTIVITY” at the top of both of your attached files.
If you have questions about G.I.F.T. or your individual submission, please contact G.I.F.T. program planner Dacia Charlesworth at the e-mail address listed above.
For clarification, a sample submission developed by Dacia Charlesworth is included below for reference.
Considering Lyrics as Public Speeches: Extending the Application of Audience Analysis
· To increase students’ understanding and use of audience analysis techniques.
· To expand students’ perceptions of what counts as persuasive discourse.
· To enhance students’ critical thinking skills
While audience analysis remains one of the most important skills public speakers can employ, the activities to assess speakers’ abilities to analyze their audiences are fairly standard: Select a speech (usually delivered by someone “famous”) and determine how that speaker adapted to her/his audience by using specific evidence from the actual speech to support your claims. Having used this approach numerous times, I know this activity successfully demonstrates how effective speakers are able to tailor their messages to their audiences; however, I sought an assignment that went beyond the basics of audience analysis (e.g., What are the demographics and psychographics of the speaker’s audience and how does s/he adapt to these concepts?). As a rhetorician, I want students to understand that rhetors in various contexts are able to construct a type of reality through their use of words and that these rhetors often encourage audiences to accept their view of reality without question. I also stress to students that while examples of rhetoric certainly include presidential addresses and speeches by Congressional representatives, rhetoric must also, as Burke notes, be thought of “[…] as a general body of identifications that owe their convincingness much more to trivial repetition and dull daily reënforcement than to exceptional rhetorical skill” (26, emphasis in original). Thus, I developed an assignment that invites students to assess the lyrics of contemporary songs since these rhetorical texts do not appear to be explicitly rhetorical.
Description of the Activity:
This activity may be completed in a 50 or 75 minute class period. This activity requires a student handout featuring questions for analysis (see below), lyrics to the song being analyzed, and a recording of the song being analyzed.
Before completing this activity, students should understand (a) the definition of audience analysis, (b) the importance of conducting an analysis of their audience, and (c) the components of audience analysis (it may even be helpful to analyze a speech together as a class to determine the demographics, psychographics, and the cultural values of a particular audience so that students have a clear understanding of how to conduct a basic audience analysis). Students should also be familiar with the notion that, through persuasive discourse, rhetors are able to develop a type of reality for their audiences. One of my favorite examples includes the naming of diseases. As Shilts reports, in the early 1980s, it seemed that gay men were overwhelmingly being stricken with a peculiar and new disease. As such, the disease was named Gay Related Illness Disease (GRID). GRID would later be renamed Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome in 1982 by the Centers for Disease Control so that the name of the illness would not just highlight one population for possible discrimination and also allowing members of other populations to assume they could not become infected with GRID if they were not gay men. This is just one example of how language can draw attention to particular aspects of a situation and deflect attention away from others.
At the beginning of class explain to the students that they’re going to be conducting a more advanced form of audience analysis to determine who rhetors are able to persuade without seeming to do so. Distribute the song lyrics to “She Thinks His Name was John” (search any popular lyrics site). Ask students to read the lyrics before you play it (this should take about 5 minutes). Play the song for the class two times and ask students to answer the following questions (this should take 15 minutes):
Questions for Students to Answer While Listening to the Song:
- What is the overall message of this song? That is, what are the rhetors (i.e., the songwriters) trying to persuade the audience to do?
- What is the role of the narrator? Is she sympathetic to the other characters? Judgmental? Informative? Be sure to use specific lines from the lyrics to support your answer.
- Is the audience expected to identify with a particular character in the song? If so, how would identifying with this character reinforce the rhetors’ persuasive message?
- What types of values (either cultural or social) do the rhetors hold? For example, what does the song encourage the audience to believe (again, be sure to use specific lines from the lyrics to support your answer)?
- Are the values identified in the song presented in an overtly persuasive manner (i.e., do the rhetors tell the audience exactly how to behave)?
- Were the rhetors successful in their analysis of their audience (i.e., how are they able to persuade listeners without making it seem as if they are doing so)?
Depending on the size of your class, you could ask individual students to share their answers with the entire class or you could assign students into group and have each individual share his/her responses with the group (this should take 10 minutes).
After students have shared their responses with their groups or the entire class, you’ll need to debrief by asking the class the following questions:
- Can you think of other examples in our culture where rhetors are able to persuade us without seeming to do so?
- Consider the importance of tone in your own speeches: Are audiences more apt to be persuaded when they think they are merely being “informed,” or when they know they’re being persuaded?
- Let’s focus on the upcoming persuasive speech in our class: Given your topic can you think of a way you might want to persuade your audience by telling them to do the opposite? That is, in the song we analyzed, the rhetors try to get audience members to practice safer sex by describing what happens when a woman did not engage in safer sex practices—could you use this type of strategy in your speech?
Students enjoy this activity since they are able to analyze a different type of rhetorical text. In addition to analyzing the lyrics, I’ve had students point to changes in the musical score and in the type of instruments used in the song as further evidence of persuasion. Since this is an in-class activity, students are awarded participation points depending on the significance of their contributions. For alternative uses or extensions of this activity, students could bring the lyrics of their favorite song to the next class to practice the skills they’ve learned and then share their analysis with their group or the entire class.
Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1969.
Shilts, Randy. And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic. New York:
St. Martin’s Press, 1987.