Details
 

February 24, 2024

High School Mock Trial - Regional Competition Makeup

Virtual

 

The 2024 High School Mock Trial Regional Competition Makeup* will take place virtually on February 24, 2024, via Zoom. Click HERE for more information.

In the case State of Buckeye v. Ash Espinosa, students will examine the history and application of the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, this case looks at excessive fines in the context of property forfeiture resulting from a crime. The defendant, Ash Espinosa, has pled guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering. The State is now looking to recover the loss of the conspiracy by seizing Espinosa’s 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, Espinosa argues against the Camaro’s seizure for two reasons: 1) Espinosa asserts that the State has seized more property and funds than what Espinosa owes and 2) Espinosa argues that, even if the Court determines that Espinosa is responsible for the remaining loss, seizure of the Camaro would violate Espinosa’s Eighth Amendment right against excessive fines.

For any inquiries or clarifications, please contact Danielle Wilmot (dwilmot@oclre.org) or call (614) 485-3507.

 

*Only in the event that a significant number of teams are not able to compete due to inclement weather.

Printer-Friendly Version


Add to Calendar aCLuDhaqizCaPxAftmqF167204 02/24/2024 02/24/2024 true America/New_York High School Mock Trial - Regional Competition Makeup   The 2024 High School Mock Trial Regional Competition Makeup* will take place virtually on February 24, 2024, via Zoom. Click HERE for more information. In the case State of Buckeye v. Ash Espinosa, students will examine the history and application of the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, this case looks at excessive fines in the context of property forfeiture resulting from a crime. The defendant, Ash Espinosa, has pled guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering. The State is now looking to recover the loss of the conspiracy by seizing Espinosa’s 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, Espinosa argues against the Camaro’s seizure for two reasons: 1) Espinosa asserts that the State has seized more property and funds than what Espinosa owes and 2) Espinosa argues that, even if the Court determines that Espinosa is responsible for the remaining loss, seizure of the Camaro would violate Espinosa’s Eighth Amendment right against excessive fines. For any inquiries or clarifications, please contact Danielle Wilmot (dwilmot@oclre.org) or call (614) 485-3507.   *Only in the event that a significant number of teams are not able to compete due to inclement weather. Virtual