Update:

What Portico and the ELCA are doing on your behalf:

The Amicus Brief, which was filed by a coalition of over 30 religious groups to demonstrate to the courts that the housing allowance doesn’t advance religious beliefs in an unconstitutional way says in summary, “The Church Alliance has a substantial interest in the validity of section 107(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 both because of the immediate impact on compensation and housing, and also because of the indirect impact on retirement
benefits.”

The goal of the Amicus Brief is to show that the clergy housing allowance is NOT in violation of the constitution and is consistent with other court rulings from the past.

The 7th Circuit Court Judge did rule the current law as unconstitutional, but the decision is being appealed. There is no tax impact on any clergy at this time.

The ELCA Office of the Secretary will continue to share news with synods as information becomes available.

 Article written by Doug Erickson, Wisconsin State Journal

MADISON — A federal judge has ruled unconstitutional a law that lets clergy members avoid paying income taxes on compensation that is designated part of a housing allowance.

The decision Friday by U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb could have far-reaching financial ramifications for pastors, who currently can use the untaxed income to pay rental housing costs or the costs of home ownership, including mortgage payments and property taxes.

“It’s a really big deal,” said Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Madison-based Freedom From Religion Foundation, which filed the lawsuit. “A church currently could pay a minister $50,000 but designate $20,000 of it a housing allowance so that only $30,000 would be taxed as salary.”

Crabb acknowledged in her decision that the exemption is a boon to ministers, referencing a 2002 statement by then-U.S. Rep. Jim Ramstad of Minnesota that the tax exemption would save clergy members $2.3 billion in taxes from 2002-07. But she said the magnitude of the benefit only underscores what’s wrong with the law.

The exemption “provides a benefit to religious persons and no one else, even though doing so is not necessary to alleviate a special burden on religious exercise,” Crabb wrote.

The defendants in the case are U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and acting IRS commissioner Daniel Werfel. Attempts to reach those agencies late Friday were unsuccessful.

Crabb said the defendants did not identify any reason why a requirement on ministers to pay taxes on a housing allowance is more burdensome for them than for the many millions of others who must pay taxes on income used for housing expenses.

Gaylor called the lawsuit “a sleeper,” saying it has received little media attention and may not be widely known by religious organizations. That will no doubt change with this win, she said. Given the dollar figures at stake, she expects clergy members to pressure the White House to appeal the decision to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago.

“Once the clergy get wind of it, I expect they will be very upset,” she said.

The law, passed by Congress in 1954, allows a clergy member to use the untaxed income to purchase a home, and then, in a practice known as “double dipping,” deduct interest paid on the mortgage and property taxes, the foundation said.

“The court’s decision does not evince hostility to religion — nor should it even seem controversial,” foundation attorney Richard L. Bolton said in a statement. “The court has simply recognized the reality that a tax-free housing allowance available only to ministers is a significant benefit from the government unconstitutionally provided on the basis of religion.”

Clergy are permitted to use the housing allowance not just for rent or mortgage but also for home improvements such as swimming pools, Gaylor said. They may exempt from taxable income up to the fair market rental value of their home, a measure particularly helpful to well-heeled pastors, she said.

“When you’re dealing with some of these mega-church pastors with huge mansions, they can be paid an enormous amount in housing allowances,” Gaylor said.

On its website, GuideStone, a Christian financial services provider based in Dallas, calls the housing allowance “the most important tax benefit available to ministers.” 

Please note that this currently only applies to Wisconsin, Illinois and Indiana. It does NOT apply to Ohio. The ELCA Office of the Secretary states that the ruling will be appealed and they will be watching the proceedings closely. Look for more information from the ELCA as news becomes available. Always consult a licensed tax advisor regarding all tax deductions and exemptions.