Committees
We welcome your involvement in any of our committees, please contact the chair below to express your interest or email the ICAI office
Conference Committee
Camilla Roberts, Kansas State University, co-chair
Blaire Wilson, Emory University, co-chair and board liaison
Chris Bryson, University of Arkansas
Dulce Abril Castro Escalón, Universidad Tec de Monterrey
Vanessa Earp, Kent State University
Jake Kasper, University of Michigan
Dawn Lesperance, Lewis Clark State College
Amanda McKenzie, University of Waterloo
Patricia Meyer, Devry University
Jennie Miron, Humber Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning (BOD)
Liliana del Carmen Almaguer Arroyo, Universidad de Monterrey
Content and Communications Committee
Candace Thrasher, Oklahoma State University, chair
Greer Murphy, University of California - Santa Cruz, board liaison
Danielle Andrews-Brown, University of Pittsburgh
Tricia Bertram-Gallant, University of California, San Diego
Joseph Brown, Colorado State University
Lucía Cordova, Universidad de Monterrey
Mary Davis, Oxford Brookes University, (BOD)
Beth Edwards, Pennsylvania State University
Shanda Hood, University of Arkansas
Alex Jeikner, The American College of Greece
Irene B. Mena, University of Pittsburgh
Ceceilia Parnther, St. John’s University
International Day of Action For Academic Integrity Committee
Rachel Gorjup, University of Toronto Mississauga, co-chair
Mary Davis, Oxford Brookes University, co-chair and board liaison
Zeenath Reza Khan, University of Wollongong Dubai
Thomas Lancaster, Imperial College London
Jennie Miron, Humber Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning (BOD)
Iryna Pavlova, Sheridan College
Sue Hackett, Independent Quality Consultant, Ireland
Emilienne Akpan, American University of Nigeria
Camilla Roberts, Kansas State University (BOD)
Lucy Puente Cruz, Tec de Monterrey
Luz Godina Silva, University of Monterrey
Membership Committee (temporarily disbanded)
Blaire Wilson, Emory University, board liaison
Research and Assessment Committee
Daniela Gallego Salazar, Universidad Tec de Monterrey, co-chair (BOD)
Alexis Ramsey-Tobienne, Eckerd College, co-chair
Jason Stephens, University of Auckland, board liaison (BOD)
Stephen Bunbury, University of Westminster (BOD)
Courtney Cullen, University of Georgia
Vanessa Earp, Kent State University
Ori Fienberg, Northeastern University
Greer Murphy, University of California Santa Cruz
Emily C. Perkins, LeMoyne College
Andrew Perry, Ohio State University
David Rettinger, University of Tulsa
Cheryle Snead-Greene, Prairie View A&M University (Texas)(BOD)
Holly Tatum, Randolph College
About
Summer Series Pre-Blog 3: Working with Faculty
What do you find most exciting/ challenging/ interesting about working with faculty in academic integrity work? Has your answer to that shifted over the years? If so, how? If not, why not? KELLY: Faculty are really the defenders of academic integrity. Because they score student work, it is instructors who notice and respond to academic dishonesty. This is a big responsibility that is not commonly recognized in our triad of teaching, research, and community service responsibilities for faculty. As a result, I am happy to support any instructor as they go through this process. Addressing academic dishonesty can be lonely work, and it is not the work that any person hoped to do when they pursued teaching in higher education. I think the biggest challenge, especially at a large university, is getting all faculty on board with our policies and procedures. For a variety of reasons, some instructors either turn a blind eye to dishonesty concerns or handle them outside of required procedures. I think this harms our learning environment in many ways and detracts from any sense of “fairness” for students.
Read MoreSummer Series Post-Blog 2: Understanding evidence
The Summer Series of webinars continues the blog takeover with the second post-webinar blog. The presenters from Workshop 2: Understanding Evidence on June 13 reflect on takeaways from their session.
Read MoreSummer Series Pre-Blog 2. Understanding evidence
The Summer Series of webinars continues the blog takeover with the second pre-webinar blog. The presenters for Workshop 2: Understanding Evidence on June 13 discuss some key questions to get you thinking about their session.
Read More